All Exotics except the pick5 to 22% from 19% (an increase of 15.79%.)
HANA surveyed its membership about the Keeneland takeout increase.
When asked whether or not HANA should organize a boycott the results were:
- 63% Yes
- 28% No
- 9% Other
When asked whether or not HANA should use the Playersboycott.org site, the results were:
- 77% Yes
- 17% No
- 6% Other
As a horseplayer I've decided to join the boycott at the PlayersBoycott.org site because I believe higher takeout is harmful to the long term health of thoroughbred racing.
As a horseplayer I believe sitting on the sidelines is not an option for me because everybody in the industry is waiting to see how players react to this.
I believe that if a clear message isn't sent: Not just Keeneland -- but other tracks -- will have takeout increases too.
When we boycotted Churchill in 2014 because of their takeout increase: They were down a solid 25% outside of the Derby.
How much of that was the market speaking and how much came from us drawing attention to the takeout increase is hard to say. But we sent a pretty clear message.
I expect Keeneland Fall 2017 numbers to mirror Churchill 2014 numbers - and be down a similar 25% to 30%.
But that may not be a strong enough message.
I believe that by getting the message out to as many horseplayers as possible -- we can knock Keeneland numbers down significantly.
I am asking you to join us by not betting one track -- Keeneland -- for one month -- October 2017. That's it.
If enough players do that:
I believe that together we can convince Keeneland to reverse their decision.
--Jeff Platt, HANA President